White House Chronicle

News Analysis With a Sense of Humor

  • Home
  • King’s Commentaries
  • Random Features
  • Photos
  • Public Speaker
  • WHC Episodes
  • About WHC
  • Carrying Stations
  • ME/CFS Alert
  • Contact Us

My Maiden Flight Without a Necktie

August 28, 2026 by Llewellyn King Leave a Comment

Friday, Aug. 14, was a seminal day for me. For the first time in my long life, I boarded a flight without a necktie. In seven decades of flying, I have never done that.

Truth is, I felt underdressed on the flight from Providence, R.I., to Jacksonville, Fla., as if I were wearing my pajamas at the White House. Oh, the shame of it. 

Men don’t wear neckties anymore. No matter that they look incomplete in a suit with an open-neck shirt, as though they hadn’t finished dressing.

Also with age, the neck loses any appeal it might have had. Nora Ephron, brilliant journalist, author, filmmaker and sometime wife of Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein, wrote a book titled “I Feel Bad About My Neck,” about the ravages of age.

Anyway, gentlemen, you looked a lot better with a necktie than with the neck open in a shirt clearly designed to be closed. A pocket square adds color, but also draws attention to the egregious omission: something around the neck.

Sitting tieless on the aisle was a traumatic, maybe even a life-changing experience for me — this sense of being partly naked in a very public place. I was wearing a blazer, shirt, long pants and socks, not the weekend-at-the-beach garb. Even so, my self-respect was in the tank.

I will say without hesitation that the necktie is a useless piece of clothing, unless you use it to wipe your eyeglasses — a no-no. It doesn’t keep you warm or keep rain off. You could use it to tie up a burglar after you have subdued him. Or you could use it as a dog leash, especially if you are walking the dog on Park Avenue.

Day in and day out, the necktie, no matter how fine the silk, how great the designer’s name, or how overpriced this strip of cloth may be, has no purpose besides acting as a security blanket for your correspondent.

I had an English master in secondary school who turned up one day with an old necktie holding up his trousers. He averred that this was an old English tradition.

Indeed so. At English public schools (private in British tradition), boys sometimes wore neckties in lieu of belts, and it was tolerated. Sometimes this was because a belt had been lost or failed, or the lad was just seeing whether he could get away with it.

From time to time, quite a few men went in for the tie that upholds.

Fred Astaire, that master of urbanity, often danced around with a necktie through his belt loops, knotted at the hip in a dashing way. Don’t try that at home — his eclectic-dancing style, that is.

I first wore a necktie and learned to tie it in primary school. It was part of the first day and remained a part of every day until I left school, got a suit on credit, and launched myself into the grown-up world — with just one necktie.

If a boy in my senior school were to wear his uniform without a necktie, he would be summoned by the headmaster for “four of the best.” If you aren’t familiar with the English nomenclature, that is four strokes with the cane, administered by the headmaster himself. Check that out with a Freudian scholar, if you like.

These days I favor bow ties, thanks to Tucker Carlson. Years ago, before he joined Fox and became part of the bric-à-brac of American politics, he wore a bow tie. When I was going to interview him on television, I donned one and, as they say, the rest is history.

The makeup artist said it made me look sexy, and I am susceptible to suggestions like that. All these years later, it is bow ties for me — even though women and men say they love my bow tie because it reminds them of their grandfathers.

Bow ties can’t hold up your pants, but they do hoist your self-esteem. I wonder why Tucker doesn’t wear them anymore.

Filed Under: King's Commentaries Tagged With: American, Astaire, British, English, flight, Fox, necktie, Nora Ephron, security

The Shady, Sometimes Wacky World of State Secrets and Security Clearances

August 29, 2025 by Llewellyn King Leave a Comment

Beware: Classified documents don’t always hide state secrets, and security clearances are used as tools of manipulation and vengeance.

Before Xerox, if you wanted to keep a copy of something, you had to type it with a carbon sheet backing every page.

In 1969, I was commissioned by a long-gone consultancy, the Arctic Company, to write a paper on the use of hovercraft by the military, especially the infantry.

They were offering $500 for the job and, like most reporters, I was keen for the income, so I signed up.

It was a time when it was believed that hovercraft — vehicles that cover the ground on a cushion of air — would be widely deployed.

I had no great insight into the vehicles or how they might be used as chariots of war. But I did have a lively imagination and access to The Washington Post library. I gorged on newspaper clippings and wrote my commissioned piece.

After it had been accepted, and I was told by the company that the army was “very pleased” with it, I forgot about it.

Then someone unrelated asked if they could see it out of curiosity. I said I didn’t have a copy, but I had been told that it had been mimeographed and widely distributed in the Pentagon.

I asked the Arctic Company for a copy, and they referred me to the appropriate office in the Pentagon. I was rebuffed. They said that it was classified and I could only see it if I had security clearance.

The Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, which controlled the nuclear establishment, military and civilian, used classification and security clearances to keep other members of Congress and the press out of its business; it regarded itself as the only responsible custodian of the nation’s nuclear secrets.

I was told that they were so classification-obsessed they couldn’t discuss the contents of the papers they had assembled to discuss because they were marked “Eyes Only.”

When James Schlesinger became chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission in August 1971, he set about overhauling the classification of documents.

I was close to Schlesinger, and he told me that he thought more than half of the AEC documents shouldn’t be classified, and he set about declassifying them. His argument: If you classify the trivial, all classification is degraded.

Dixy Lee Ray, the last chair of the AEC, became a friend of mine. I invited her to dinner at the venerable Red Fox Inn & Tavern in Middleburg, Virginia, established in 1728. It is a pleasant place to dine and claims to be the oldest continuously operating inn in America.

Ray went everywhere with her two dogs (Ghillie, a Scottish Deerhound, and Jacques, a miniature poodle), and they were in her limousine wherever she went. The car also contained — as I am sure the secretary of energy’s car does today — the hotline that would be part of the launch procedure, in the event a nuclear attack was ordered by the president.

In her briefcase, Ray had an innocuous study she had wanted to give to me.

It was a blustery night, and her driver was waiting in the car in the parking lot with her briefcase on the back seat and both dogs on the front seat.

The moment Ray opened the rear door, two things happened: A great gust of wind arose and Ghillie leapt from the front seat to the back seat, upsetting the briefcase. Crisis!

All the papers in the briefcase, many of them marked with the big red X of classified documents, blew all over the parking lot.

The three of us, in panic mode, set about scouring the bushes for them in the dark, fearing that someone would find one of them and, so to speak, the jig would be up. We could imagine the headlines.

After an hour’s search, we figured we had gathered all the papers, and Ray did an inventory. Nonetheless, the next morning I drove out from Washington to make sure no nuclear secret was impaled on a bush branch.

From the time when J. Robert Oppenheimer lost his security clearance under murky circumstances, these have been used as a tool of manipulation and vengeance.

If a scientist or a manager loses their clearance, they can appeal in a long, difficult and expensive process. Even if the victim appeals, the damage is done; the subject is damaged goods, publicly humiliated as morally deficient and untrustworthy.

Filed Under: King's Commentaries Tagged With: America, Classified, documents, hovercraft, job, nuclear, Oppenheimer, Pentagon, Schlesinger, security, Xerox

Unwelcoming House

December 3, 2009 by White House Chronicle 4 Comments

 

 

There is a knot of people standing outside the Northwest Gate of the White House. They are cold and unhappy, clutching driver’s licenses and other forms of identification.

Taking his turn, one man shouts into a communications box. He has an appointment, but he is made to feel as though he is a rascal after the silver.

There are no welcome mats at this or any other gate to the White House. You feel under suspicion until you are cleared in–when you go from indignity to thrilling proximity to power.

There are no waiting rooms or seats at the gates. There is no one posted at the gates to welcome visitors.

Things go badly for visitors who are not carrying ID. Some years ago, singer Vic Damone and his wife, Rena Rowan Damone, showed up at the Northwest Gate. They had an appointment, but Mrs. Damone didn’t bring her purse and didn’t have any ID. No ID, no entry.

The Damone tableau is played out frequently. The People’s House is not people-friendly.

Worse, because entry is badly organized, and often excessively restrictive, neither visitors nor guards respect the system–a clue as to how the Bonnie and Clyde of social-climbing, Tareq and Michaele Salahi, got in to President Obama’s first state dinner without an invitation, and even spoke to the President.

Security at the White House gates has grown since the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. Every subsequent administration has built on the excess security, and faux security, of the previous one.

The guards are members of the uniformed unit of the Secret Service. They complain about the job a lot. The problem seems to be pay; their beef contributes to the attitude faced by visitors.

The Salahi affair demonstrates how too much security results in a breachable wall. But there is too much faux security in Washington, too.

Since 9/11, a vast army of security people (rent-a-cops) has taken over corporate and government buildings in the nation’s capital. They sit at desks or in glass boxes in the lobby of almost every office building. They are there to get visitors to sign in and to show the dreaded ID.

But you can sign in as almost anyone and nothing happens. Any name is good enough in the world of faux security.

Every week I go to a particular radio studio, where I have to sign in and wait for a producers to escort me. The busy producers have to leave their consoles. The guards know this is a waste of time and effort. Everyone despises the charade and, therefore, disrespects the system.

At Voice of America headquarters, you have to produce a driver’s license and have your picture taken each time you enter the building. Taking pictures of all visitors is something even the White House does not require.

So which national secrets is Voice of America hiding that the White House is not? –-For the Hearst/New York Times Syndicate

 

Filed Under: King's Commentaries Tagged With: Secret Service, security, state dinner, Tareq and Michaele Salahi, Voice of America, White House

White House Chronicle on Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube
Democratic Lightheadedness Won’t Erase Trump’s Stain

Democratic Lightheadedness Won’t Erase Trump’s Stain

Llewellyn King

It sounds like an admonition from a senior detective to a junior colleague: Assume nothing. Right now, across America, a lot of political assuming is going on, mostly among Democrats. The first assumption is that the Democrats will win the midterms. It is dangerous to assume the winner of any race until the winning post […]

Spot the Illegals — a Chilling, Sad Neighborhood Game

Spot the Illegals — a Chilling, Sad Neighborhood Game

Llewellyn King

Here is a disturbing game: Try to spot the illegal immigrant. Is it the waitress, the winning one from Bulgaria, or is it the charming emergency room doctor from Pakistan, or is it one of the Mexican men working on the housing site at the corner? Maybe it is the Haitian caregiver in your home, whom […]

The Question That Must Be Answered: How Dangerous Is AI?

The Question That Must Be Answered: How Dangerous Is AI?

Llewellyn King

Races have winners and losers — at least so I have always thought. At some point, the competition ends and a winner is identified, whether it is first-past-the-post as in a horse race, or first in the marketplace as in a commercial race. Think about VHS and Betamax. Similarly, we knew who won the space […]

9/11 — The Tragedy That Didn’t Have To Happen

9/11 — The Tragedy That Didn’t Have To Happen

Llewellyn King

There is a terrible truth about 9/11: It didn’t have to happen. Something as simple as a hardware store lock could have deterred the perpetrators. The arguments against hardening cockpits were numerous, and now seem unconvincing to the point of being risible. They included: It would cost too much; the public had to see the […]

Copyright © 2026 · White House Chronicle Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in