White House Chronicle

News Analysis With a Sense of Humor

  • Home
  • King’s Commentaries
  • Random Features
  • Photos
  • Public Speaker
  • WHC Episodes
  • About WHC
  • Carrying Stations
  • ME/CFS Alert
  • Contact Us

Guns and the Middle Class

September 23, 2013 by White House Chronicle 7 Comments

The thing about gun lovers is that they are passionate. The thing about those who aren’t gun lovers, is that they simply want the killing to stop. That makes the argument asymmetrical and gives the advantage to the gun lovers.
 
After every mass shooting – Columbine, Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, and now the Navy Yard – there is outrage among the articulate middle class, but in time it dies down. This, too, is asymmetrical.
 
The thing about mass shootings is that, as often as not, the victims are middle class. The middle class can't get to the barricades fast enough when it is they who are in trouble; but it is notably absent when their members aren't being shot or, for that matter, imprisoned, frisked, or fighting on the front lines.
 
In Chicago, an average of three homicides occur every night. On Labor Day alone, 12 people were killed and 25 wounded. But these are almost all in the ghetto and are black-on-black.
 
We lose 31,000 people to gun deaths, accidental suicide and murder every year. By 2015, gun deaths will exceed road fatalities. Most of the gun deaths will be among youngsters on the street.
 
Cars are getting safer by design, as new technology is incorporated. Guns are getting more dangerous by design, as more civilian versions of military weapons flood the country.
 
Military weapons are supposed to be lethal. The most obvious example of a modified battlefield weapon is the AR-15; it is the civilian version (semiautomatic instead of fully automatic) of the U.S. Army’s basic assault rifle, the M16. The AR-15 featured in the Sandy Hook shootings.
 
Let’s take time out for people like me who like guns. I love the feel of them, the inherent majesty of them, the transference of power when you heft one. Yes, they make you feel more manly, more like a card-carrying member of the warrior class.
 
I learned to shoot when I was quite young, maybe 11. The thrill — the sense of being augmented — stays with you. Guns are seductive. If you are young and male, the seduction is complete; you have a pocketful of machismo.
 
But if you are young and male and you live on the streets of a city like Chicago or Houston or Los Angeles, entrapped by drugs and gangs, your gun will seem like your best friend until someone else’s gun takes your life, or you take another life. In this demimonde, children who are too young to have been in love are not too young to kill or be killed.
 
Joe Madison, a tireless crusader for many causes, and broadcaster on SiriusXM Satellite Radio, urged after the Sandy Hook shooting rampage that the bodies — the broken, bloody, shattered bodies — of the schoolchildren, should be shown on television. That way, he argued, the nation would be shocked into action.
 
No good, in other words, showing the flowers and the teddy bears. Guns don’t make flowers and teddy bears; they make gaping, lethal wounds.
 
It was the pictures of the wounded and the dead that turned the tide of public opinion during the Vietnam War; it was stark pictures that drove home the horror of lynching.
 
If the day in, day out murders were documented, if the agony of the street killings were exposed by a modern-day Charles Dickens, this national veneration for the tools of killing would pass. Guns would begin to go where they belong: under lock and key, or in a well-ordered militia.
 
Guns don’t enhance freedom, they curtail it; they put our cities off limits to many after dark and take life. Death is the absolute confiscation of freedom.
 
The gun lobby cannot be fought the way Piers Morgan of CNN fights it — with logic. The victims must speak from the grave through photography, video and even fiction.
 
You don’t fight the gun lobby; you undermine it with the silent voices of those it has claimed. Guns kill people. — For the Hearst-New York Times Syndicate

 
 
Email, RSS Follow
Email

Filed Under: King's Commentaries

Comments

  1. Linda Gasparello says

    September 27, 2013 at 1:18 pm

    You have expressed in your column today what I have been thinking for years. Get rid of guns,period. Our world would be safer, happier, more at peace without these atrocious takers of life.

    Page Morris
    Sent from my iPad

    Reply
  2. Linda Gasparello says

    September 27, 2013 at 1:18 pm

    You have expressed in your column today what I have been thinking for years. Get rid of guns,period. Our world would be safer, happier, more at peace without these atrocious takers of life.

    Page Morris
    Sent from my iPad

    Reply
  3. Linda Gasparello says

    September 27, 2013 at 1:24 pm

     
    Thank you for your column in today’s State [The (Columbia, SC) State, Sept. 24) paper.  To speak publicly against the prevalence of guns in our modern culture of the Wild West takes courage, especially here in the gun-toting South.  I especially appreciate your pointing out that guns don’t enhance our freedom but curtail freedom.  Are we really free when we are not safe, anymore than a society can be free when it is hungry, homeless, and uninsured?  I’m afraid that the Tea Party has given “freedom” an adolescent definition:  the freedom to do what I want whenever and wherever I want without regard to the welfare of others.  — Rev. Neal Jones, Unitarian Universalist minister of Columbia

    Reply
  4. Zek says

    September 27, 2013 at 4:18 pm

    Just because you want to give up your rights  does not mean I need to give up mine !

    Reply
  5. Zek says

    September 27, 2013 at 4:18 pm

    Just because you want to give up your rights  does not mean I need to give up mine !

    Reply
  6. Howdy says

    September 27, 2013 at 4:58 pm

    Both "road deaths" and homocide with a firearm are decreasing yearly and have steadily been doing so.
    The sum total of rifle deaths is less than 1% of all deaths by firearms.  Given those facts, you want to ban a scary black rifle?
    More emotion than facts.  Not a way to make decisions.

    Reply
  7. Alan Perez says

    September 28, 2013 at 8:25 am

    Your right, if it saves one life its worth it………..but here somethings you should worry about first before guns.

    Heart disease: 597,689
    Cancer: 574,743
    Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 138,080
    Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 129,476
    Accidents (unintentional injuries): 120,859
    Alzheimer's disease: 83,494
    Diabetes: 69,071
    Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 50,476
    Influenza and Pneumonia: 50,097
    Intentional self-harm (suicide): 38,364
    Traffic fatalities: 32,367 
    Firearm homicides:  11,078

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

White House Chronicle on Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube
How U.S. Natural Gas Came Back from the Dead

How U.S. Natural Gas Came Back from the Dead

Llewellyn King

The Trump administration is proud of America’s dominance in natural gas. The nation is the world’s largest producer and a net exporter. We produce a quarter of the world supply of the fuel, which has become fundamental to electricity production. Forty-three percent of our electricity is generated from natural gas. According to the Energy Information […]

Foreign Aid That Works — the Malawi Story

Foreign Aid That Works — the Malawi Story

Llewellyn King

In 2005, Gordon Brown, British chancellor of the exchequer, later prime  minister, was in Washington, seeking to raise $50 billion annually in  additional international aid for Africa. I hosted a press event for Brown at the National Press Club, and I  asked him how all this money would get to the people who needed it? […]

Is Rubio Starting a Nuclear Arms Race in the Middle East?

Is Rubio Starting a Nuclear Arms Race in the Middle East?

Llewellyn King

The Trump administration has announced and appears to be crowing over an agreement with Saudi Arabia to help the kingdom not only to build nuclear power plants but also to enrich the uranium fuel. There is no reason for the Saudis to enrich uranium. There are plenty of willing suppliers of enriched uranium and more […]

Soft Power, the Secret Sauce of the British Empire

Soft Power, the Secret Sauce of the British Empire

Llewellyn King

When President Trump, on the first day of his second term, closed the U.S. Agency for International Development and began dismantling the Voice of America, he also severely curtailed what had been America’s soft power dominance in the world. With those actions, we abandoned something of inestimable value: the ability to project Americanism, our ideals. […]

Copyright © 2026 · White House Chronicle Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in